The Changing Nature and Definitions of Industrial Design and Implications for Prospective Undergraduate Students

Authors

  • Mike Goatman Department of Industrial Design, Coventry University
  • Louise Moody Department of Industrial Design, Coventry University

Keywords:

Industrial design, design thinking, learning style categorization, university applicant

Abstract

There are currently a wide range of Higher Education Industrial Design courses available in the UK. In the present era, a wider breadth of narrative has developed within the subject, and as a result the content of industrial design educational offerings varies considerably. The paper assesses the industry view of Industrial Design as a discipline from the perspective of those employing university graduates. These views illustrate a change in the discipline, and this is considered in respect to current education practice. The choice of entry courses for the student wishing to embark on a career in the subject has also widened. It is argued that at present, the access to courses offers a haphazard informational stream to the potential applicant. An approach to developing an online facility to enable potential students to apply for the right course is discussed. It is suggested that a consistent and comparable platform of guidance is needed by which potential students can identify and match the course offering against their aptitudes and aspirations. A framework for such a system is proposed. Given that course choice will ultimately define the nature of their career opportunities it is argued that this would be a useful and productive asset.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-20

How to Cite

GOATMAN, M.; MOODY, L. The Changing Nature and Definitions of Industrial Design and Implications for Prospective Undergraduate Students. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 21–29, 2014. Disponível em: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1637. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.