Mining institutional data for hidden truths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.iip.vol10iss2article93Keywords:
re-assessment, student progression, transition, student achievement, student outcomesAbstract
While a great deal of thought and effort is devoted to developing assessment strategies, policies and processes, there is little evidence that the re-assessment of students who fail at the first attempt receives the same level of scrutiny. This Viewpoint paper is stimulated by a research project, discussed at the HEIR (Higher Education Institutional Research) Conference (LJMU, September 2016) that explored the success rates of undergraduates who have had Level 4 re-assessments. One of the purposes of this research was to understand more explicitly how re-assessment policies can contribute to the retention, continuation and success of students, one of the metrics referred to in the higher education White Paper, ‘Success as a Knowledge Economy’.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is retained by the author and will be published under a CCBY-ND-NC (Creative Comons Attribution, no derivatives, non-commerical) license.